In response to Florida’s booming aerospace and defense industry and the need for our clients to have the best-in-class design-build company close at hand, The Austin Company announced the opening of a new office in Merritt Island, Florida.
“The Austin Company’s first aviation project was for Curtiss Aeroplane and Motor Corporation in 1916,” explains President and CEO Mike Pierce. “Since then, Austin has planned, designed, engineered, and constructed more square footage of commercial and military aviation and aerospace facilities than any other firm of its kind in the United States. This includes projects for Northrop Grumman and Embraer on the Space Coast.”
“With our legacy and new clients in mind, Austin has invested in expanding its presence in Florida. We look forward to our ongoing design-build work on Florida’s Space Coast,” said Vice President of Operations Matt Eddleman. “This new office will be a hub for our aerospace and defense subject matter experts, designer, engineers, and construction management professionals.”
According to Space Florida, the Aerospace industry has contributed $5.9 billion to Florida’s economy since 2007, with a projected impact of $1.1 billion every year for the next five years.
Austin’s legacy clients and more recent partners include Aerojet Rocketdyne, Airbus, The Boeing Company, Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, Embraer, and General Atomics, including NASA, NAVFAC, and USAF. Austin is a full-service, design-build company offering site location consulting, design, engineering, and construction. Headquartered in Cleveland, Austin has offices in Atlanta, Georgia; Irvine, California; Kalamazoo, Michigan; Merritt Island, Florida; San Luis Potosi, Mexico; and London, United Kingdom. The Austin Company is a subsidiary of Kajima.
Repeat business, new clients, and a successful expansion into Mexico, via Kajima|Alberici MX contributed to ongoing growth for Austin’s California office in the 2010s.
Mexico – Kajima|Alberici MX
In response to the Economic Partnership Agreement implemented between Japan and Mexico in 2005, Kajima Corporation began discussions with Japanese automotive manufacturing clients about new projects in Mexico in late 2008 and 20098. As a result, Kajima included The Austin Company in its strategic plans to target automotive and related manufacturing projects in Mexico.
It was not until late 2010 that a definitive plan was established to pursue work in Mexico. A decision was made that Austin would head up a new entity in Mexico to pursue and execute project work on behalf of Kajima Corporation. Austin recommended establishing a joint-venture company with J.S. Alberici Constructors out of St. Louis, MO.
Austin had successfully worked with Alberici on the Boeing Delta IV project in a joint-venture arrangement. Alberici already had a construction operation in Mexico and knew its way around the subcontractor and supplier market. An agreement was made with Alberici to form Austin|Alberici MX. This was quickly changed to Kajima|Alberici MX to establish a clear tie to Kajima Corporation for its Japan-based clients.
A series of Kajima clients and projects were pursued. Between 2012 and 2017, projects included two major projects for Y-Tec KEYLEX at the Mazda Supplier Park in Guanajuato, a major project for Stanley Electric, and a project for Tokyo Roki. The Y-Tec KEYLEX project was recognized by Engineering News Record (ENR) in 2014 as a Global Best Project in the Manufacturing category.
Y-Tec KEYLEX
The approximately 600,000 SF Y-Tec Keylex Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (YKM) automotive parts manufacturing and assembly facility was implemented as a design-build project at the Mazda automotive complex in Guanajuato, Mexico. Austin provided design and engineering out of the Irvine, CA, office and served as the lead member of the joint venture for construction.
Y-Tec Keylex Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (YKM) automotive parts manufacturing and assembly facility
Stanley Electric
For Stanley Electric, Kajima|Alberici designed, engineered, and constructed a 240,000 SF LED-based headlight and taillight assembly manufacturing facility for automobiles and motorcycles. The project was also implemented on a design-build basis, with Austin providing design and engineering out of the Irvine, CA, office. Austin served as the lead member of the joint venture for construction. The facility was completed in 2016.
In 2017, a new Austin entity called Austin Mexico assumed responsibility for operations in Mexico, replacing Kajima|Alberici MX.
Ford Motor Company
Austin’s Irvine, CA office partnered with Irvine-based LPA Design Studios for the programming, site selection, master planning, and design and engineering through design development bridging documents for Ford Motor Company’s new product development center and headquarters in Mexico City.
The project included 360,00 SF of engineering and corporate office space, 250,000 SF of engineering lab space, a 98,000 SF dining and training center, and a 2,000-car parking structure to support 3,500 employees. The project included the creation of outdoor collaboration and connecting spaces. The building was designed to achieve LEED Silver certification. Construction Documents were prepared by Austin’s subsidiary company Gala and Associates.
Ford Motor Company’s new product development center and headquarters in Mexico City.
Austin (and its subsidiary and sister Kajima companies) have served Ford Motor Company worldwide for over 100 years, including recent and current major project work for the company in Mexico and the U.S.
Northrop Grumman
The 2010s continued to be active in serving Northrop Grumman in Southern California with projects at the El Segundo, Manhattan Beach, Redondo Beach, Palmdale, and San Diego, CA sites, as well as Melbourne and St. Augustine, FL.
Melbourne and St. Augustine, Florida
In March 2013, Northrop Grumman announced the creation of five Centers of Excellence across the United States. This corporate initiative aimed to improve its strategic alignment with customers’ need for increasingly innovative and affordable products, services, and solutions. Northrop Grumman’s campus in Melbourne, FL, was designated as one of the five Centers of Excellence – A Manned Aircraft Design Center of Excellence. Their campus in St. Augustine, FL, was designated a Manned Aircraft Integration Center of Excellence.
Given the specialized requirements of the facility, the project team began planning for a new building – Building 228. Austin provided overall site planning, architectural design, engineering, and construction services for this 210,000 SF aerospace program administration, engineering office, and lab building.
Planning and design began concurrently in late April 2013, and in early May structural engineering was underway for what would be Northrop Grumman’s newest program, engineering, and lab building. Architectural and MEP engineering followed structural only days behind. Construction commenced in the third week of August (three months after the start of planning), with the first structural steel in the air in October 2013. Just ten months after groundbreaking, 13 months after the start of engineering, and 14 months after the first pen went to paper, the project achieved a mid-June 2014 beneficial occupancy. This is one of the fastest-ever project implementations for Northrop Grumman and Austin for a new building of this technical complexity and size. By all industry standards, this was a three-year project, implemented in just one year.
The project was awarded LEED® Silver Certification. The Design-Build Institute of America (DBIA) awarded the project a 2014 Design-Build Merit Award, and Engineering News Record (ENR) awarded the project a Regional Best Projects Award.
Building 229
Overlapping the construction completion of Building 228, Austin began constructing a sister facility, Building 229. This building, at 219,000 SF, houses program administration and engineering offices for Northrop Grumman’s Manned Aircraft Program. Construction of Building 229 began in July 2014. The Certificate of Occupancy was received in mid-April 2015 – just 42 weeks from the groundbreaking. This was a second fast-track project on an accelerated schedule to meet Northrop Grumman program requirements. The project was awarded LEED® Gold Certification.
Building 100
Concurrently with the planning, design, engineering, and construction of Building 228 in Melbourne, Austin undertook the planning, design, engineering, and construction of Building 100 in St. Augustine, FL. At approximately 366,000 SF, the new Aircraft Manufacturing Center facility supports the production of the E-2D Advanced Hawkeye Aircraft and was designed and built on an accelerated schedule to meet E-2D production schedules.
In response to an aggressive completion schedule, Austin began planning, design, and engineering in September 2013 and broke ground for implementing a phased construction approach in January 2014. Austin was able to beat an originally projected 18-month schedule, despite heavy rains impacting several months of construction. At approximately 310,000 SF, Phase A was delivered in just 16 months and included a 220,000 SF high bay with a 220-foot clear span center bay and two 85-foot clear span side bays; 60,000 SF of office and support space; a 13,000 SF auditorium and cafeteria; and 14,000 SF of initial-phase mechanical and electrical support space. The building was delivered to Northrop Grumman on May 4, 2015, to allow the installation of aircraft manufacturing workstations and equipment. Offices were fully furnished with IT systems in place, ready for move-in. Initial High Bay production operations began on May 14, 2015.
The project was awarded LEED Gold certification and Engineering News Record (ENR) Regional Best Projects and Design-Build Institute of America (DBIA) Awards.
Space Park – Redondo and Manhattan Beach, California
Austin has supported Northrop Grumman (and heritage TRW Space and Electronics) at the California Space Park Campus for over 35 years. During that time, Austin completed a wide variety of projects providing services including planning, design and engineering, and construction.
M1-M2 Complex Modernization and Expansion – Redondo Beach, California
Representative of this work is the M1-M2 manufacturing complex modernization and expansion. The objective of the overall program was to maximize, consolidate, and expand current advanced technology labs and manufacturing assembly areas into large, flexible spaces with a modernized advanced technology production line.
In 2016, Austin began by developing a master plan for the effort, defining a series of phases for the implementation. To meet this new concept, additional square footage was required, including the addition of manufacturing and test high bays with offices, labs, and control rooms.
This was followed in 2017 by the design, engineering, and construction of Phase 1, which included a 45,800 SF addition to Building M2 inclusive of a manufacturing high bay (with overhead cranes), labs and test areas, and office area. The high bay, labs, and offices are secure areas designed and constructed to ICD-705 requirements. The project also included renovation and modernization of the existing M2 first-floor labs and manufacturing areas, including clean rooms.
Phase 2 planning and design began in 2021 and included an addition to Building M1 with two new cleanroom final assembly super high bays (60 foot clear to hook) – with 20 and 40-ton overhead cranes – totaling 34,000 SF. Both high bay spaces are secure and designed to meet ICD-705 requirements. Construction began in early 2022 with a Spring 2023 occupancy.
Lockheed Martin
Skunk Works – Palmdale, CA In 2019, Austin continued its relationship with Lockheed Martin by undertaking the first major new project in Palmdale in 35 years, the planning, design, engineering, and construction of a 220,000 SF Advanced Aerospace Manufacturing Center. The ICD 705 compliant center (with multiple DoD Classified SCIFs) supports aircraft prototype-to-final assembly, with associated tooling, structures test, and material handling systems for large-scale composites. It spans 152,000 SF and includes program offices, conference, presentation rooms, a café and market, and additional amenities totaling 68,000 SF. Construction was completed in late 2021. The project is anticipated to achieve LEED® Gold Certification.
The Austin Company provided planning, design, engineering, and cost-estimating services for a new 60,000 SF spacecraft development center, Building 351. The ICD 705 compliant facility is divided between high bay and low bay space plus a common core and facilities infrastructure. (The project construction was placed on hold following design completion.)
Austin also completed projects for Aviation, Aerospace, and Defense clients Aerojet Rocketdyne, Aerospace Corporation, and General Atomics during the 2010s.
The Walt Disney Company
In 2015, Austin actively continued the relationship that had begun in 1988 with The Walt Disney Company, with a series of projects in preparation for the new Star Wars Land at the Disneyland Resort in California. The projects involved developing new Disneyland Resort “Back of House” operations support facilities so that existing back-of-house areas could become a part of the Disneyland Park guest experience area as Star Wars Land. These new facilities included:
Transportation Service Center
Tram Refueling Depot
Circle D Ranch / Carriage House
Stables and Kennels
Horticulture / Landscape Complex
Environmental Activities Center
Pyrotechnics Launch and Staging
West Side Laydown and Staging
Relocation of Historic Pope House
Austin provided planning, design, engineering, and construction services.
U.S. Bakery
In 2017, Austin began a new client relationship with U.S. Bakery (also known as Franz Family Bakeries), in Portland, OR. The project involved the design, engineering, and construction of a 50,000 SF expansion at Franz’s bakery facility in Springfield (Eugene), OR, to support continued growth and provide increased production capacity and flexibility for the baker.
B|Braun Medical
Along with many other continuing clients, Austin cultivated its relationship with B|Braun, which begin in 2005 and led to over 50 projects at B | Braun’s Irvine, CA campus. Projects throughout the 2010s included designing and engineering for a major expansion to their Duplex Filling Line and Facility in 2019. The project involved the integration of a new filling line and expansion of the Duplex production facility and utilities to support the increased demand for the product Cephalosporin.
The Next 100 Years
Austin’s California office entered the 2020s well prepared to begin its next 100 years in January 2023 with a solid local California, regional, and national market footing in Aviation, Aerospace and Defense, Entertainment, Food & Beverage, and Pharmaceuticals and Medical Products, among other markets and industries.
The Austin Company announced that Sean Barr, former National Accounts Manager and Director of Project Planning, will assume the position of Vice President.
“Our clients find Sean to be a valued partner in the design-build process. He brings decades of food industry experience to every project, with a primary focus on the meat and poultry sector. We look forward to his growth potential in this core market,” said President and CEO Mike Pierce.
“I am thrilled to move into the position of Vice President at The Austin Company. This is a role that I have been working towards for decades, and I am excited to take on the new responsibilities and challenges that come with it,” said Barr.
As Vice President, Barr will work closely with leadership and the market teams to help drive the growth of Austin’s meat and poultry, alternative meat, and related food markets to ensure that Austin continuously improves and evolves to meet the needs of its customers.
“When Sean joined Austin, we created a vision to become a preferred service provider to the meat and poultry industry and increase Austin’s presence in that market. Through Sean’s passion, perseverance, and his team’s “Results, Not Excuses” mindset, Austin is now a design-builder of choice for many of today’s leading meat and poultry producers,” explained Sr. Vice President of Operations Matt Eddleman.
Barr has worked in the food industry for over 35 years and has been with The Austin Company for 13 years. He earned his Bachelor of Science in Industrial Engineering from Mississippi State University and obtained his master’s degree in Project Management from Keller Graduate School of Management, DeVry University. He also holds Project Management Professional (PMP) certification from the Project Management Institute and Professional Project Executive (PPE) certification from Prodevia Learning. Barr is a sought-after speaker and thought leader within the food industry.
Austin is a full-service, design-build company offering site location consulting, design, engineering, and construction. Headquartered in Cleveland, Austin has offices in Atlanta, Georgia; Irvine, California; Kalamazoo, Michigan; Merritt Island, Florida; San Luis Potosi, Mexico; and London, United Kingdom. The Austin Company is a subsidiary of Kajima. To learn more about Austin – www.theaustin.com.
Hussein Elhage, Gala and Associates new President.
Gala & Associates, Inc., announced that Hussein Elhage, former Sr. Vice President, will assume the position of President as founder Chuni Gala steps into a new role as Executive Advisor and Director.
“Hussein has been with Gala since the inception. He will continue the traditions and legacy of Gala & Associates into the future, providing continuity, stability, and sound leadership,” said the outgoing President and founder of Gala & Associates, Inc., Chuni Gala. “Hussein is well respected throughout the industry, and his name is synonymous with Gala & Associates.”
“The depth of leadership experience within Gala & Associates is one of the reasons The Austin Company was drawn to acquiring the company,” said President and CEO of Austin, Mike Pierce. “Hussein has been with Gala since the beginning. He has progressively grown with the company, taking on additional leadership responsibilities, assisting in the development of Gala’s scope of services throughout the U.S. and into Mexico, mentoring young engineers, and overseeing Gala’s data and technology departments.”
“I am honored to be able to continue to grow the relationships we have built over the past 35 years and lead Gala into the future. I am proud of the company we have built, the team we have assembled, and I look forward to the future,” said Elhage.
Hussein holds a B.S. degree in Civil Engineering and a master’s degree in Civil Engineering from Wayne State University. He is a licensed professional engineer in multiple states.
Gala provides architectural engineering, design, and project management services for automotive assembly and heavy industrial facilities. Established in 1987, Gala is headquartered in Beverly Hills, Michigan (a Northern suburb of Detroit, Michigan).
Austin took ownership of Gala in 2022. Headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio, Austin has offices in Atlanta, Georgia; Irvine, California; Kalamazoo, Michigan; Merritt Island, Florida; San Luis Potosi, Mexico; and London, United Kingdom. The Austin Company is a subsidiary of Kajima.
The Austin Company will exhibit (Booth C12210) at the International Production & Processing Expo (IPPE) in Atlanta, GA, Tuesday, January 25 – 27, 2023. A collaboration of three shows – the International Feed Expo, the International Meat Expo, and the International Poultry Expo, this comprehensive industry event showcases the latest technology, equipment, supplies, and services used in producing and processing eggs, meat and poultry, and those involved in animal food manufacturing. The event will be held at the Georgia World Congress Center.
TechTalk with Sean Barr, Vice President
In addition to exhibiting, Austin Vice President Sean Barr will share “The Practical Application of the Theory of Constraints” as part of the event’s TechTalk, Wednesday, January 25, 2023, in C Hall, Booth C10611, from 3:30 pm – 3:50 pm This thought-provoking offering covers…
How to identify what’s standing in the way of achieving your production goals.
Austin’s subject matter experts are on hand to answer your questions. So, stop by our “Ask Us Anything” beer night event on January 24th, 3 p.m. – 5 p.m., in Austin’s booth (C12210).
One-on-one Consultations
There is still time to book a one-on-one consultation. Austin’s meat and poultry facility design experts will share their insights on your greatest challenges. Contact Matt Shank at matt.shank@theaustin.com to book your meeting time.
A retrospective of the first 100 years of work completed by Austin’s California Office.
The world anxiously anticipated the countdown to 2000 as computer experts warned of catastrophic errors related to the formatting and storage of calendar data for dates in and after the year 2000. But the potential to bring down worldwide infrastructures for industries ranging from banking to air travel didn’t materialize thanks to many preemptive strategies.
Austin ushered in the 2000s with repeat business from legacy clients, new clients, and a successful transition to being a part of the Kajima USA group of companies in late 2005, contributing to the continuing growth of Austin’s California office throughout the 2000s.
Repeat clients included aviation, aerospace, and defense companies – most notably Boeing and Northrop Grumman. The office returned to Toyota with a series of national projects, undertook numerous new projects for Disney, and completed a long list of Southern California Edison projects under the seven-year agreement signed in 1997.
New clients and projects included a major seismic upgrade and renovation project for the US General Services Administration (GSA), emergency operations centers for Los Alamos National Laboratory and the County of Santa Barbara, and what would become new long-term relationships with Mater Dei High School and B|Braun Medical. In the late 2000s, the office launched the company’s plans to expand operations into Mexico, serving as the lead partner in Kajima-Alberici MX.
Boeing Fitness Center
Aviation, Aerospace, and Defense
Austin completed over 175 projects for Aerospace Corporation, Boeing (and its heritage companies), Gulfstream Aerospace, Lockheed Martin, and Northrop Grumman (and heritage company TRW Space & Electronics) in the first half of the decade alone (between 2000 and 2005).
For Boeing Space Systems, Austin continued work at the Decatur, AL, 1.5 million SF Satellite Launch Vehicle Production Center supporting the relocation of the Delta II and III programs to the Decatur plant. Austin also worked in Long Beach, CA, supporting the C-17 Airlifter program facilities. Support included the design and engineering of a new fitness center to serve 10,000 employees of the C-17 program. Totaling 14,000 SF, the fitness facility included a cardiovascular training area, strength/weight training area, aerobics studio, locker and shower rooms, and administrative spaces. Exterior areas featured a running trail, a multi-use soccer/football field, and basketball, tennis, and sand volleyball courts. Austin’s long relationship with Boeing, combined with recent experience completing a new fitness center for Southern California Edison in Rosemead, CA, made Austin the ideal choice for the project.
Northrop Grumman. The 2000s continued to be active in service to Northrop Grumman and heritage company TRW Space & Electronics in Southern California with more than 200 projects at the El Segundo, Manhattan Beach, Redondo Beach, and Palmdale, CA sites.
Automotive
Austin returned to the automotive industry following a short break during the 1990s with a series of projects for Toyota. This included design, engineering, and construction work at Toyota’s auto body plant in Long Beach, a vehicle repair facility in Torrance, CA, and modernizations and expansions at Toyota Motor Sales regional facilities in Boston, Cincinnati, Denver, Kansas City, and San Ramon, CA.
Entertainment
Austin actively continued the relationship that had begun in 1988 with The Walt Disney Company, with over 50 new design and engineering projects at the Disneyland Resort – over 40 projects in the first half of the decade alone (2000-2005). Most notable of these projects are the attractions infrastructure throughout the park, “back of house” support projects, and the Disneyland Hotel renovation and modernization.
Austin’s multi-discipline design and engineering team’s considerable experience with facilities infrastructure (across multiple industries) and understanding of the technical complexities of Disney’s attractions (based on decades of motion picture and television production facility experience) provided Disney with unequaled “industry cross-over” experience.
The Back of House group of projects included:
The New Entertainment Center, adjacent Rehearsal Hall, and Recording Studio
Uniform Issue and Cast Lockers
Supply Chain Logistics Warehouse
Transportation Center
Tram and Vehicle Maintenance Centers
DISNEYLAND HOTEL ROOMS — The focal point of each new guest room at the Disneyland Hotel is the stunning new headboard that features an artistically carved representation of Disneyland parkÕs famous Sleeping Beauty Castle. Fiber optics are used to create a magical skyline with fireworks Ð bringing the immersive park experience into the room. (Scott Brinegar/Disneyland)
Austin was selected as the Architect of Record and Engineer for the major renovation of the Disneyland Hotel based upon their knowledge of the hotel complex infrastructure from prior projects, multi-disciplinary in-house team approach, and experience working with the company. The Austin Team completed a comprehensive Condition Assessment of the three main towers of the hotel complex then proceeded with Schematic Design, Design Development, and preparation of Construction Documents for the renovation. During construction, Austin provided full-time on-site representation and on-call engineering support from its Irvine, CA, offices.
The Disneyland Hotel renovation was a multi-year project encompassing the full renovation and modernization of the hotel’s original three main towers, including 970 guest rooms, top-floor suites, and lobbies. The 1955 hotel underwent a head-to-toe makeover that encompassed every guest room. The new guest rooms were conceived by designers at Walt Disney Imagineering with a concept that included many Disney touches, such as hidden Mickeys in the carpeting, the bathrooms, and other niches, and headboards that light up with a fiber-optics display of the world-famous Disneyland fireworks above Sleeping Beauty Castle.
The rooms were outfitted with energy-efficient lighting and double-paned, energy-efficient windows that were tinted blue to give the towers a new exterior look. The work was done in phases, with the Dream Tower completed first, then the Magic Tower and Wonder Tower rounding out the project. Disney maintained a high occupancy level at the hotel throughout the renovation, with construction crews sensitive to maintaining a positive guest experience.
Austin also provided construction management staffing support (construction project managers and superintendents) for constructing the California Adventure theme park addition to the Disneyland Resort.
Mater Dei High School
Mater Dei High School, and the Diocese of Orange County, CA.
In 2000, Mater Dei High School, and the Diocese of Orange County, CA, selected Austin to provide design and engineering services for a series of new projects, including a library, sciences building, student activities center, gymnasium, aquatics center, athletic fields, and performing arts center.
Mater Dei is the largest Catholic High School west of the Mississippi and is well known nationally for its academic and athletic programs. Austin was introduced to Mater Dei through our Disneyland relationships and is proud to continue to serve Mater Dei, now entering our 23rd year.
Southern California Edison
In 1997, Austin signed a major seven-year agreement with Southern California Edison as their sole facilities design, engineering, and construction partner. Between that signing and the end of 1999, Austin was awarded 95 projects. Between 2000 and 2005, Austin was awarded an additional 78 projects. Representative projects included call centers, data center upgrades, a complete renovation of the Rosemead Headquarters (including a new central plant), regional service centers, and training centers.
Federal General Services Administration (GSA)
Austin completed two design-build projects for the Federal General Services Administration (GSA), including the modernization of the US Geological Survey campus in Menlo Park, CA, and a seismic upgrade, renovation, and modernization of the Santa Ana Federal Building also in CA.
Austin was selected for the Santa Ana Federal Building project based on its design-build experience, multi-disciplinary in-house design and engineering capabilities, and proposed solution to responding to the building’s seismic performance deficiencies.
Los Alamos National Laboratory (Department of Energy – DOE)
Austin was awarded the contract based on its design-build experience and expertise in high-reliability operations centers. “In addition to its unique one-stop-shop approach, The Austin Company presented an innovative solution to difficult design parameters,” shared the construction manager for the Cerro Grande Rehabilitation Project.
University of California – Santa Barbara
Austin constructed an Engineering Sciences Building (for nanotechnology) at the University of California’s Santa Barbara campus.
B|Braun Medical
In 2005, Austin began providing design and engineering services for B|Braun Medical in Irvine, CA. Austin has served B|Braun continuously since that time.
International Projects
In the late 2000s, Austin launched plans to expand operations into Mexico, with the California office as the lead partner in what would become Kajima-Alberici, MX. More on these projects in the 2010s article.
Join us next in the next blog as we discuss the 2010s.
“You can use an eraser on the drafting table or a sledgehammer on the construction site.”
These words were spoken by none other than Frank Lloyd Wright, and while the tools of the trade may have changed, the sentiment has never been truer.
The modern eraser for any complex build is a process known as clash detection. Before components are ordered, delivered, or prefabricated, a digital representation of those components is combined in a virtual 3D environment and compared. The software can quickly point out where one component collides with another. Examples include a drainpipe running through a foundation footing, a sprinkler head in conflict with a duct, or light switches buried inside a column.
Due to the rigid necessity of many architectural and structural elements in a design, it is not uncommon for contractors and others to refer to clash detection as MEP coordination. The operative assumption is that various mechanical, electrical, and plumbing components must be adjusted and routed around conflicts.
Ultimately, all the hard clashes are resolved. The only question is whether clashes are addressed through updates to virtual models and drawings or in the field. Working through clashes in the design phase is more efficient and cost-effective than on the construction site.
In his book, The Checklist Manifesto, Dr. Atul Gawande visited an active construction project and marveled at using a software application he referred to only as the ‘Clash Detective.’ The sobering message for the AEC industry is that we were presumed ahead of other industries (such as healthcare) in applying our knowledge to work through every possible conflict. It seems clear that in 2022 and beyond, building projects that skip design review through clash detection exercises are not meeting the standard of care for our industry.
Many potential issues go beyond a software’s current identification capabilities, so involving field personnel in the review of models is always a good idea. The experience gained on one project leads to checking for the same challenges on future projects.
Case in Point Building professionals should understand early in the design process about connection points for building services. Somewhere between all the code books and the operations manuals, there are some practical minimums for equipment clearances. Only veteran modelers are savvy enough to show such clearance zones within the computer’s representations. And often, those who have worked in the field have insights into where following the manual or meeting the minimum code requirement isn’t going to provide the best result.
There is not, in fact, a computer application called clash detective. Until recently, this model-checking feature was only found in a single software tool. One of the most powerful changes in the methodology was when it became possible to identify conflicts and share the exact 3D viewpoint (and notes for resolution) with the modeler in their authoring application.
Prior to this change, it was necessary to hold clash review meetings so everyone could crowd in together to see the issues for the first time. Now tracking issues and sharing them can occur within minutes of identification. We can keep the topical dialogue outside of regularly scheduled meetings. Instead of walking into a model review meeting and not knowing what issues will be raised or that you’ll be tasked to fix, team members can turn to assignments on the tracked issues list.
Meetings can then be used to check and confirm that things have been (or soon will be) resolved. We can delve deeper into an issue, increasing both awareness and the possibility that someone else on the team may have a better idea of how to resolve the conflict.
Another change seems to be in the air. While clash detection was once a discrete activity with the potential of not applying the coordination of models to the building process, it is now feasible to manage the 3D model changes, field reports, and digital images in one unified platform. Knowing that the same models can serve both aspects of quality assurance helps us to deliver our customer’s projects on time and with a minimum of re-work.
Thank you to Nirav Mehta, Mark Osborne, and Brian Zuzik for contributing to this blog post.
With business from legacy clients and the addition of new—including international—clients, the 1990s were a period of continued growth. The office produced major projects for aviation, aerospace, and defense, as well as key projects in broadcasting and entertainment, newspaper printing, and publishing. This work, coupled with a significant contract with Southern California Edison and international projects in Japan, China, South Korea, and The Philippines, kept the office fully utilized.
Aviation, Aerospace, and Defense
In the 1990s, no market growth was greater for Austin than in aviation, aerospace, and defense. Austin worked on over 150 projects for multiple companies in the industry, including Boeing (and its heritage companies), BF Goodrich Aerospace and Rohr, Inc. (today both are a part of Collins Aerospace), Hughes Aircraft Company (now a part of Raytheon), Lockheed Martin, and Northrop Grumman (and its heritage companies), totaling nearly $1 billion in today’s market.
Boeing Space Delta IV Launch Vehicle Manufacturing and Assembly Facility
The largest of these projects was for Boeing Space Systems. The project supported the race to win a large share of the rapidly growing space launch market. Already a key rocket supplier, McDonnell Douglas Aerospace (now a part of Boeing), headquartered in Huntington Beach, CA, selected Austin in early 1997 to begin conceptual design for a new rocket manufacturing plant. It was the first such facility in nearly 40 years and was designed to produce what would be its newest product, the Delta IV rocket series. Austin completed the conceptual design within five weeks and proceeded with further design and cost estimating.
In June, Austin was released on the preliminary design and development of a 1.5 million SF Satellite Launch Vehicle Production Center. In late November, Austin was awarded a design-build contract for the project partnering with J.S. Alberici of St. Louis, MO. Austin served as the A/E of record.
Design activities ramped up dramatically through March 1998. Austin’s A/E team refined the design through the application of value engineering and the use of principals identified with the worldwide trend toward the “Lean Aerospace Initiative.”
Following a demanding 26-month construction schedule, the facility was completed in late 1999, allowing initial production to begin in February 2000.
Over 2,000 drawings were issued for the project
Over 4 million cubic yards of earth were moved during grading and excavations
14 miles of pilings were driven
At its peak height, the building soared to 140 feet and averaged 75 feet
Truss lengths up to 220 feet created clear spans and supported 33 bridge cranes with capacities of up to 30 tons
The entire facility was environmentally controlled to 72 degrees Fahrenheit 24/7/365
At its peak, the construction workforce numbered 1,400
In today’s market, the project would be valued at nearly $600 million
Today, the complex is operated by the United Launch Alliance (ULA), a joint-venture company of Boeing and Lockheed Martin. The complex produces the well-known Delta IV, Atlas V, and Vulcan Centaur rockets.
Boeing Sea Launch, Austin implemented upgrades to over 200,000 SF of existing facilities and constructed two new buildings, including a Payload Integration Facility at a 75-acre site formerly occupied by the U.S. Navy in Long Beach, CA. A project worth $40 million in today’s market.\
Northrop Grumman. The 1990s was a busy time with a list of more than 50 projects in Southern California. Austin designed, engineered, and constructed facilities at Northrop Grumman’s El Segundo, CA facility to accommodate the relocation of B-21 Labs from Pico Rivera, CA. This project would amount to nearly $40 million in today’s market.
Austin has served Northrop Grumman in California and nationally since the 1960s – over 60 years.
During the 1990s, Austin also designed, engineered, and constructed multiple projects for Lockheed Martin Aeronautical Systems (Skunk Works). This included expansions to Buildings 636 and 637 in Palmdale, CA, (originally built by Austin in the late 1980s). Austin also supported Lockheed Advanced Development Company’s move to Palmdale.
Austin recently completed (Spring 2022) Lockheed Martin’s Building 648 Advanced Aerospace Manufacturing Center at the Palmdale complex, some 35 years following the 1980s relocation of Skunk Works to Palmdale.
Broadcasting and Entertainment
KPDX-TV, in Portland, OR
As the digital broadcast era began to take hold in the 1990s, Austin was active globally in new television broadcast facilities. Austin was instrumental in replacing aging 1950s facilities through modernization and upgrades to existing facilities.
Austin completed more than 60 projects for broadcasting and entertainment clients during the 1990s, including projects for ABS-CBN Broadcasting (Manila, Philippines), Fox Television, Meredith Corporation (Television Broadcasting), Munhwa Broadcasting (Seoul, Korea), National Broadcasting Company (NBC), Republic Broadcasting (Quezon City, Philippines), Tribune Broadcasting (KTLA-TV5), and The Walt Disney Company.
KPDX-TV, in Portland, OR
A prime example of the California office’s work during this time was two projects for Meredith Corporation. This work included a 45,800 SF television broadcast station, KPDX-TV, in Portland, OR, and a 53,900 SF television broadcast station, WGCL-TV, in Atlanta, GA.
Austin continued their relationship that had begun in 1988 with The Walt Disney Company. Austin undertook 25 design and engineering projects at Disneyland in this decade and our first construction project at the park, Tomorrowland.
Newspaper Printing and Publishing
Newspaper print circulation in the US peaked in the 1980s, and Austin’s business in this market was booming in the 1990s. Austin’s California office did work for Copley Newspapers (San Diego Union-Tribune, Torrance Daily Breeze, and multiple papers in Illinois), Cox Arizona Publications, The Daily News (in Valencia), Dow Jones & Co., Imperial Valley Press, Oxnard Press Courier, San Gabriel Valley Tribune, and West Coast Community Newspapers.
Southern California Edison
Southern California Edison
In 1997, Austin signed a major seven-year agreement with Southern California Edison as their sole facilities design, engineering, and construction partner. Between that signing and the end of 1999, Austin was awarded 95 projects. Representative projects included call centers, data center upgrades, a complete renovation of the Rosemead Headquarters (including a new central plant), regional service centers, training centers, and even a pole climbing school. Austin implemented more than $120 million in projects.
International Projects
Austin’s California office supported a series of international projects throughout the Pacific Rim. These included projects in Japan, China, South Korea, and The Philippines.
In Japan, Austin participated in six major projects in partnership with a consortium of Japanese companies as a part of the US/Japan construction agreement reached in May 1988. Under the agreement, the Japanese government ensured that American companies could participate in competing for the construction of public works, such as airport projects. Austin’s responsibilities on these projects included value engineering, selection of subcontractors, and construction management.
Projects included the 800,000 SF Wing B of the Asia and Pacific Trade Center located on Nanko Island in Osaka Harbor, a 290,000 SF passenger terminal at the Hiroshima Airport, and a 1.3 million SF air cargo terminal and baggage handling system at the Kansai Airport. The Kansai Airport project represented the largest civil construction project in which an American company participated since the US/Japan construction agreement was signed.
Other Industries
Other industries served by Austin Western in the 1990s included food and beverage, general manufacturing, and continued work for the U.S. Postal Service.
Join us next in the next blog as we discuss the 2000s.
The 1980s were a period of expansive growth for The Austin Company. Legacy clients continued to trust Austin with their facility design, engineering, and construction needs. And new clients in Aviation, Aerospace and Defense, Automotive, Broadcasting, and Entertainment benefited from Austin’s expertise.
Aviation, Aerospace, and Defense
· Douglas Aircraft Company (today a part of Boeing)
Representative clients and projects during the 1980s included:
For Douglas Aircraft Company (a division of McDonnell Douglas Corporation – now a part of Boeing), Austin designed, engineered, and constructed a 1.1 million SF high-bay aircraft assembly building in Long Beach, CA. (2022 Construction Value: Over $400 million.) The complex produced the well-known C-17 Globemaster III airlifter.
For Lockheed Martin Aeronautical Systems (Skunk Works) Austin designed, engineered, and constructed two major projects: a 200,000 SF composites manufacturing facility – Building 636 and a 125,000 SF metallic fabrication center – Building 637 in Palmdale, CA. (2022 Construction Value: Just under $250 million.)
The Skunk Works is well-known for its work in advanced aircraft design. Austin recently completed (Spring 2022) Lockheed Martin’s Building 648 Advanced Aerospace Manufacturing Center at the Palmdale complex, [insert link to project profile] some 35 years following the relocation of Skunk Works to Palmdale in the 1980s.
Austin also did work for Lockheed Missiles and Space during the 1980s in Sunnyvale, CA, and at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida.
For Northrop Corporation, Austin designed, engineered, and constructed a 240,000 SF advanced production development center for the F-5G in Hawthorne, CA. (2022 Construction Value: Over $82 million.)
Austin has served Northrop Grumman in California and nationally on a nearly continuous basis since the 1960s. Within the past ten years, Austin’s Western office led the implementation of three major projects for Northrop Grumman in Florida and California. Austin is presently working on multiple projects at Space Park in Redondo Beach, CA, where it has served Northrop Grumman for more than 35 years.
Automotive
Toyota Motor Sales
Representative clients and projects during the 1980s included:
American Honda Motor Company
Toyota Motor Sales
For American Honda, Austin designed a series of Rider Education Centers for street and off-road motorcycles, ATVs, and SXS off-road vehicles. These facilities included plants located in Georgia, New Jersey, Ohio, and Texas.
For Toyota, Austin designed and implemented the interiors for Toyota’s U.S. headquarters (then in Torrance, CA), and designed, engineered, and constructed a parts distribution center in San Ramon, CA. (2022 Project Value: Over $75 million.)
Broadcasting and Entertainment
KVVU – Channel 5, Henderson, NV
Representative clients and projects during the 1980s included:
Meredith Corporation (Television Broadcasting)
National Broadcasting Company (NBC)
The Walt Disney Company
Austin continued its work in the broadcast industry begun in the 1930s, designing, engineering, and constructing a new 31,700 SF television broadcast station, KVVU-TV, in Henderson, NV for the Meredith Corporation. This was the first in a series of new television broadcast facilities that Austin would do for Meredith across the country. (2022 Value: Just under $12 million.)
For National Broadcasting Company (NBC)Austin continued its work at the Burbank Studio, which began in the 1950s, completing the site’s development. Among other projects, Austin designed, engineered, and constructed the last new production studio – Studio 11, totaling 62,000 SF. (2022 Construction Value: Over $22 million.)
The Walt Disney Company. In 1988, Austin began a nearly 35-year service relationship with Disney at the Disneyland Resort that continues to this day.
Data and Operations Centers
Bank of America – Orange County
Representative clients and projects during the 1980s included:
Arizona Public Service
Cedar-Sinai Medical Center
Chevron Oil Field Research
Douglas Aircraft Company
First Security Company
Kaiser Permanente
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power
Salt River Project
Security Pacific National Bank (today a part of Bank of America)
Southern California Edison
While the 1980s were big for Aviation, Aerospace, and Defense projects, it was also a momentous decade for Austin in Data and Operations Centers, with ten major projects (listed above) totaling millions of square feet.
Security Pacific National Bank. Representative of Data and Operations Center projects was Austin’s work for Security Pacific. Austin designed, engineered, and constructed a new 688,000 SF operations center in Brea, CA. This was the fourth data center for Security Pacific by Austin. Truly state-of-the-technology at the time, the operations center could process over 3 million checks per day, with an employee population of 2,500. Operational reliability was critical. Supporting this reliability was an uninterrupted power supply, served by a gas-turbine-powered cogeneration system, which produced all power required for the building (the public utility was the backup supply). Although the Brea Operations center represented the leading edge of data-processing technology (in the 1980s), it was designed with the flexibility to accommodate future changes in technology. (2022 Construction Value: Over $325 million.)
Bank of America (including heritage Security Pacific National Bank) operated the facility for over 39 years – in recent years, as a call center. In late 2021, Amazon acquired the facility for its use as a call center. Photos of the building look the same as they did on that opening day in 1982.
Logistics / Distribution
US Army Lathrop, CA
Representative clients and projects during the 1980s included:
Kaiser Permanente
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
U.S. Postal Service
For Kaiser Permanente, Austin designed, engineered, and constructed a central pharmacy facility in Downey, CA.
For the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Austin designed and engineered a series of three Area Oriented Supply Depots in California, Pennsylvania, and Texas. Representative of these three depots is the Lathrop, CA facility serving ten Western states and the Pacific. At 832,00 SF, the facility contains inventories of 157,950 small items and 83,600 pallet-size materials. Austin also implemented and installed computer-controlled warehouse material handling systems.
For the U.S. Postal Service, Austin designed and engineered a 318,000 SF General Mail Facility in Santa Ana, CA.
Other Industries
Other industries served by Austin in the 1980s included Food and Beverage, Newspapers, and Real Estate Development.
Our executive team has been talking about trust and being a “trusted partner” a lot lately. Trust is ethereal. It’s intangible but being able to trust someone—a spouse, a friend, or a business partner—seems substantive, almost spiritual. Trust carries weight and significance, and consequence.
Trust between organizations is complex. It begins with a one-to-one relationship between key individuals. The trust they create then works like a flywheel, creating momentum and building broader trust between the two organizations. From there, every interaction between the client and Austin either accelerates that flywheel or slows it. In other words, the trust between a client and Austin grows or diminishes.
It has been said that the sales process starts the flywheel in motion. It is the character of the salesperson representing Austin that creates alignment with our client’s needs, opens communication, and builds a sense of reliability. This foundation gets the flywheel moving. It is what creates trust.
The larger the organization, the more flywheels there are to maintain. Each flywheel represents a different trust relationship – trust between client and suppliers, for instance. Each one must be maintained and serviced, or it slows down. These flywheels are connected, so they will slow if trust at any level of our relationship with our client is violated. Logically it follows that these flywheels will speed up and create more momentum when the keepers of the flywheels are engaging and collaborating well. Trust is high, and the relationship is strong.
In the complex relationships between companies doing business together, there will always be developments that slow the flywheel. People are not perfect. Competing influences can sometimes require compromises with a client. It’s at these times that the trust you’ve built —the momentum in the flywheel—can overcome an application of friction. It is up to the keepers of the flywheel to maintain the momentum.
One of the most common events that slows a flywheel of trust is bad news. Situations beyond our control like labor shortages and supply chain challenges can cause delays and cost escalation. How does one deal with bad news and maintain the trust of the client? To begin, both parties must understand that bad news is a part of every meaningful relationship. However, how the parties deal with the bad news can be a strong catalyst for building trust. The ability and commitment to overcome challenges by working together is what forges a strong, trusting relationship. Bad news is an opportunity to grow trust. Embrace it!
At a recent event in the bakery industry, Tim Cook, Chairman of Linxis, shared his communication policy when it comes to sharing bad news with a customer. He said, “Be transparent. Be expedient. Be consistent.” This is a powerful reminder of what is at the very heart of building trust.
When bad news surfaces, own it. Don’t slow the flywheel. Feed the trust built with the client by communicating early. It’s helpful, but not always necessary, to have a solution ready when presenting a problem, especially if the problem is significant. It’s better not to wait until a problem is vetted and solved. Sometimes the solution will take time and money, and you may not even be sure the solution will work. Be expedient about the news to ensure that you stay ahead of it. Reliable communication – even if you’re communicating bad news – builds trust and keeps the flywheel moving. Get ahead and stay ahead of the problem through communication.
Being transparent with bad news is difficult. You want to be perfect for a client; you want to be the hero. But that is not feasible in today’s complex environment. Disclosing a problem is confessing that our quest for the perfect client relationship has failed. Even when everyone performs their function at the highest level, OBE (overcome by events) occurs. Being transparent makes us feel vulnerable.
Patrick Lencioni, in his book The Five Dysfunctions of a Team, suggests that without trust, you cannot have an open and honest debate. Trust forms the basis for open dialog. Where there is a collaborative environment searching for a solution, trust is built, and progress is achieved. In other words, transparency— facing a problem alongside an informed client—can keep the flywheel moving to preserve or even increase trust.
Trust is not something to create blindly because it comes with an element of responsibility. We must always remember that people are fallible. We hold people accountable for their commitments and trust their intent and competence to do what’s right. But we must always be aware of the flywheel and be prepared to nurture trust in whatever form necessary for our clients to be successful. We must do what’s necessary to be our clients’ most trusted partner. Life, and work, are better when you work in an environment of trust. When there is a bond of trust, everyone gains the benefits of collaboration and the joy of community that comes from sharing success.
“The best way to find out if you can trust somebody is to trust them.”
Ernest Hemingway
“You must trust and believe in people, or life becomes impossible.”
Anton Chekhov
“Trust is the glue of life. It’s the most essential ingredient in effective communication. It’s the foundational principle that holds all relationships.”
The International Baking Industry Exposition is the largest trade event for the grain-based foods industry in the Western Hemisphere. Held September 17-21, 2022, at the Las Vegas Convention Center, this unique event features the latest innovations, new ingredient formulations, and insights.
Austin’s site location and design-build experts versed in baking and snack production will be on hand to answer your bakery design questions. Whether you are looking to build new, update, or expand, Austin is your source for smart bakery design. Let’s start a conversation; stop by booth #1310.
Don’t Miss Education!
Dave Watson, Baking and Snack Subject Matter Expert
Designed for Success – Making the Right Choices for Your Bakery
Saturday, September 17, 2022, 8:30 am – 9:30 am
Encore Presentation Sunday, September 18, 2022, 11 am – 12 pm
Dave Watson has nearly 40 years of experience in the food industry. He serves as one of Austin’s Baking & Snack Subject Matter Experts and Project Manager. His expertise spans a comprehensive range of food plant engineering aspects, including robotics and packaging automation. Dave gained much of his experience during his tenure at Pepperidge Farms/Campbell’s. He began as a project engineer and then managed the design and construction of Pepperidge Farm’s flagship plant in Denver, PA.
Dave earned his bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from Drexel University (1981) and his M.B.A. from Saint Joseph’s University (1996). He has served on the American Society of Baking (ASB) Executive Committee, Bakery Equipment Manufacturers Association (BEMA) Baking Industry Forum Committee, the American Baker’s Association (ABA), and the International Baking Industry Exposition (IBIE) 2010, 2013, 2016, and 2019 Committees.
His education session includes real-world scenarios that set the stage for an open discussion about renovating, expanding, or building a new facility. Both large and small bakery designs will be covered, including:
Construction professionals know that reinforced concrete, as a building material, offers unique benefits to structures. Buildings made of reinforced concrete are incredibly robust, exhibit outstanding performance in corrosive environments, and possess inherent fireproofing capability.
A special type of reinforced concrete structural element is the precast double T concrete beam (double-T beam), which is used as a vertical support element in floor and roof systems. A double-T beam is cast in a factory in a sectional shape that resembles two “T”s joined together – hence the name “double-T” (see Figure 1). The double-T beam offers superb cleanliness due to the elimination of dust-collecting horizontal surfaces, making them ideal candidates for buildings with clean production needs as in some food and medical devices manufacturing.
This system also allows for long spans of more than 60 feet and thus is often chosen for buildings requiring voluminous column-free space (like parking garages and open manufacturing plants). Furthermore, the double-T beam concrete allows for superior longevity even in harsh building interior conditions (such as steam exposure).
The vertical stem of the T makes it hard for conduit and lighting to be routed, so it’s very good for facilities where there is enough headroom for process utilities and lighting to be placed below the T and above the ceiling.
Precast vs. Cast-in-Place Factory workers prepare long double-T-shaped casting beds in a linear assembly.
Cast-in-place construction refers to concrete structural elements cast at the location of the final position in the building. The double-T beam is precast in a factory and fabricated off-site in a factory. It is shipped to the project site, where it is set into its final building position. Precast construction allows for superior fabrication quality control and important beam-strengthening operation known as prestressing to take place. As the name suggests, prestressing is a factory operation that applies a “pre-force” onto the beam before the application of building loads. The prestressing operation is critical to provide the double-T beam with adequate strength and stiffness to support significant loads over long spans. The prestressing operation is generally completed as follows:
Factory workers prepare long double-T-shaped casting beds in a linear assembly.
Workers position reinforcing into the casting beds per the Structural Designer’s details and specifications.
Workers will pre-tension special types of high-strength reinforcement called “strands” which have been placed into the casting beds. The pre-tension operation occurs by anchoring one end of the strands to the casting bed, and then pulling on the strand from the far end with a hydraulic jack, producing tens of thousands of pounds of tension in the strand (see Figure 2).
Concrete is then poured into the casting beds with the strands held in high tension.
When the concrete has cured, the external pulling force in the strands is removed. The strand immediately attempts to shrink back to its unstretched shape – but it is now restrained along its length by the newly cast concrete. This permanent tension in the strand thus manifests as a stabilizing compression force in the double-T beam (the prestressing force).
A typical length of a double-T beam is 70 ft long by 10 ft wide. The beams typically also have an upwards camber due to the prestressing operation. These beams are shipped from the factory to the project site on truck beds. Cranes at the project site latch onto the double-T beams at pick points and lift and set them to their final positions in the building. As the positioned beams begin to support building loads, the prestress is induced upward, and the camber flattens to a horizontal level.
The robust double-T beams have a relatively large area (700 SF for a 70 FT long x 10 FT wide beam), so large areas of floors and roofs are quickly constructed as the beams are erected into place.
An important component of most double-T beam floor and roof assemblies is the cast-in-place concrete topping diaphragm. The topping is a thin layer (typically 2-1/2 to 4 inches thick) that provides a level horizontal surface across the entire floor or roof and acts as a structural “diaphragm” (A structural diaphragm is a thin, stiff plate that provides lateral stability to the structure when it is subject to seismic and wind forces). During the factory production process, grooves are fashioned across the tops of the double-T surfaces; the cast-in-place topping concrete keys into these grooves and allows the topping and precast double-T to act compositely (in unison) to resist the superimposed floor or roof loads.
Maintenance-free
Precast concrete requires little to no maintenance after installation. By contrast, steel assemblies often require patching, repair, and reapplication of fireproofing, insulation, and any paint coatings.
Special Considerations for Precast Concrete
Precast double tees are unique products that are built by precast concrete companies. Typically, the precast concrete company is subcontracted by the general contractor for a project. The distance of the closest precast concrete plant to the project will dictate the cost of shipping to the project site. However, in most locations throughout the United States, precast concrete elements can be shipped at competitive prices. Here are a few important considerations for using double-T beams for your project:
Concrete Super-Structure. Double-T beams are optimally connected to concrete girders, concrete columns, and concrete walls. All these supporting building components are typically precast (in a factory and shipped to the site), but it is feasible to cast-in-place (use formwork to cast the members at their final position). Either way, it is important to remember that double-T beams are typically part of overall concrete buildings.
Shipping. As discussed, precast double-T beams need to be shipped to the job site. So, the location of the closest precast concrete company, shipping costs, and shipping schedule need to be factored into the overall project scope.
Installation. Concrete double-T beams and other concrete precast elements are heavy (typical single element weights can be 25 Tons or more). Crane selection, crane staging, and construction site safety plans are critical aspects for the design and construction team to assess and plan.
A client’s unique needs are always at the forefront of our design process. To learn if precast concrete roofing is right for your project, reach out to our team.
Along with continuing business from legacy clients, the 1970s were a period of significant growth— a lot of projects and many new client names—for Austin’s California Office (Western District at the time).
New clients and projects for Austin, California were substantially in two markets: General Industrial and Operations Centers (Data Centers), the latter being an emerging market in the 1970s for Austin worldwide.
Left Top: Beckman Instruments, Inc. Right Top: Chevron Oil Left Bottom: American Honda Motor Company Right Bottom: Steelcase Inc.
General Industrial
Representative clients and projects during the 1970s included:
American Honda
Beckman Instruments
Chevron Oil Field Research
The Clorox Company
Jafra Cosmetics
Smith Tool
Stauffer Chemical
Steelcase
Syntex
Toyota Motor Sales
For American Honda Motor Company, Inc. Austin designed, engineered, and constructed a 300,000 SF Regional Parts Distribution Center in Stockton, CA. (Equivalent to $165 million in today’s market.)
For Beckman Instruments, Inc., Austin designed, engineered, and constructed 12 projects throughout California. Four were significant design, engineering, and construction projects, including a corporate data center, laboratory, manufacturing, and office buildings. (2022 Value: More than $135 million.)
For Chevron Oil Field Research Company, Austin designed, engineered, and constructed a 76,000 SF office building in La Habra, CA. (2022 Value: More than $26 million.) This was the first in a series of projects for Chevron at the La Habra Research campus.
For The Clorox Company, Austin designed, engineered, and constructed a research building in Oakland, CA. (2022 Value: $34 million.)
For Jafra Cosmetics, Austin designed, engineered, and constructed a cosmetics manufacturing plant in Canoga Park, CA. (2022 Value: $30 million.)
For Smith Tool Company, Austin designed, engineered, and constructed 11 projects, including a forge shop. (2022 Value: More than $26 million.)
For Stauffer Chemical Company, Austin designed, engineered, and constructed a research laboratory in Richmond, CA. (2022 Value: Approximately $50 million.)
For Steelcase, Inc., Austin designed, engineered, and constructed a 330,000 SF expansion to their Tustin, CA, office furniture manufacturing facility. (2022 Value: More than $56 million.)
For Syntex USA, Inc., Austin designed, engineered, and constructed a laboratory facility in Palo Alto, CA. (2022 Value: $70 million.)
For Toyota Motor Sales USA, Inc., Austin designed, engineered, and constructed multiple facilities for Toyota, including a 220,000 SF distribution center in San Ramon, CA, and a 90,000 SF office building in Torrance, CA. (2022 Value: $75 million.)
Left: United Airlines Advanced Reservation Center Right: Valley National Bank
Operations Centers (Including Data Centers)
Representative clients and projects during the 1970s included:
First Security Bank
Security Pacific National Bank
United Airlines
Valley National Bank
For First Security Company (Bank) Austin designed, engineered, and constructed a 195,000 SF bank operations center (data center) in Sal Lake City, UT. (2022 Value: More than $50 million.)
For Security Pacific National Bank, Austin completed eight planning projects (data center related, including planning for a new major data center in Brea, CA, that would become a significant design, engineering, and construction project for Austin beginning in 1980.
For United Airlines, Inc., Austin completed the design and engineering for a new 55,000 reservations center in Los Angeles, CA. (2022 Value: $20 million in construction .)
For Valley National Bank, Austin designed, engineered, and constructed a nearly 100,000 SF computer center in Phoenix, AZ. (2022 Value: Close to $50 million.)
Legacy Clients
Austin received continuing business from legacy clients in the 1970s, including continued work for NBC (started in the 1930s), completing more than 40 projects in Burbank during the 1970s alone. Projects included designing, engineering, and constructing a new 76,500 SF technical and office building. (2022 Value: $25 million.)
Austin also continued with work for Northrop Corporation completing a series of projects at the Hawthorne, CA site.
All totaled, Austin undertook more than $1 billion (in 2022 dollars) in work during the 1970s, averaging $100 million a year over the ten years, with much of the work being awarded in the late 1970s and construction rolling over into the 1980s. Austin also moved its primary California office from Los Angeles (Wilshire Blvd.) to Irvine, CA, in 1975 (18800 Von Karman).
Austin’s new office, Irvine, CA
Join us next month as we discuss the 1980s and Austin’s California office continues to grow.
The Austin Company announced that Chris Jackson had been promoted to Vice President Operations and General Manager for Austin Eastern Operations, reporting to Senior Vice President of Operations, Matt Eddleman. For the near term, Jackson will continue to lead the Eastern Operations Preconstruction Department.
Austin also announced the promotion of Fabricio Salinas to Managing and General Director of Austin Mexico Operations. Project operations, engineering, preconstruction, and sales will report to Salinas, who will be supervised by Eddleman.
“It is always an honor to promote from within. Chris Jackson has been with Austin for seven years and has been a vital part of our Preconstruction Department. He has demonstrated his leadership abilities and commitment to client relations. Likewise, Fabricio Salinas, who has worked for Austin for five years, embodies Austin’s values and has been a highly effective manager of our operations there. We look forward to his leadership there as we seek to grow our presence and success in Mexico,” said President and CEO Mike Pierce.
A retrospective of the first 100 years of work completed by Austin’s California Office.
Austin continued with project work for NBC in Burbank, completing more than 20 projects in the 1960s alone. For ABC, Austin completed approximately ten projects, including their Hollywood television studios (see photo below).
Following the entertainment industry business segment, Austin completed an additional 15 projects for Technicolor Corporation, a client and part of the industry that Austin served over the next 30 years.
Lockheed (Lockheed California Company) became an active client in 1962, a relationship that continues today. Austin’s work at Burbank Airport (see Through the Decades – The1930s) provided the connection to Lockheed, who, until the late-1980s, also called the Burbank airfield home. Austin’s nationwide work in the aviation industry for companies including Boeing, Douglas, and McDonald made the engagement with this new client seamless for Austin– we knew aviation.
Austin also began major work with Northrop (Northrop Corporation Norair and Space Divisions), completing more than 30 projects during the 1960s. These facilities were home to the Northrop F-5 family of supersonic light fighter aircraft. This included the original F-5A and F-5B Freedom Fighter. Though primarily designed for a day air superiority role, the aircraft was also a capable ground-attack platform. The F-5A entered service in the early 1960s. During the Cold War, over 800 were produced through 1972 for U.S. allies. Though at the time the United States Air Force (USAF) did not have a need for a light fighter, it did procure approximately 1,200 Northrop T-38 Talon trainer aircraft, which were based on Northrop’s N-156 fighter design.
Austin once again demonstrated its broad range of aviation experience opening doors to work in the aviation and defense industry across the country. This included projects with Grumman on the east coast beginning an active and ongoing relationship with Northrop Grumman that has spanned more than 60 years.
Freedom Fighter
Other clients with multiple projects during this time included familiar names such as Ford Motor Company, Montgomery Ward, Sunkist Growers, the Bureau of Yards and Docks, and U.S. Navy Facilities Engineering Command (collectively known today as NAVFAC). Less familiar names (today) included Burroughs Corporation, Pacific Southwest Realty (Security Pacific National Bank) – today a part of Bank of America, the Upjohn Company (now a part of Pfizer), and several Southern California newspaper printing companies – which would become a significant market segment for Austin in the decades ahead. Join us next month as we discuss the 1970s as Austin’s California office ventures into a series of new and expanded market segments and relocates from Los Angeles to Irvine, California.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
This website stores cookies on your computer. These cookies are used to collect information about how you interact with our website and allow us to remember you. We use this information in order to improve and customize your browsing experience and for analytics and metrics about our visitors both on this website and other media. To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy.
If you decline, your information won’t be tracked when you visit this website. A single cookie will be used in your browser to remember your preference not to be tracked.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “ACCEPT”, you consent to the use of all cookies. For more information, please visit our Privacy Policy.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
